The Great Vaccine Debate

August 12th, 2009

Encountered this article today: The Terrifying World Of Vaccine Adjuvants. The topic of vaccines and potential harm to children has been a hot topic and certainly one that my wife and I are intensely interested in. We researched quite a bit prior to making our own decision with regard to our daughter. We decided not to allow any vaccines to be administered.

Let me explain our reasoning:

Syringe plunging into a vaccine bottle

Syringe plunging into a vaccine bottle

  1. Several vaccines still contain Thimerosal as a presevative. Thimerosal contains mercury and may have adverse effects on a child’s development. It is because of this that it is banned in 70 countries (just not the US). The new H1N1 vaccine will include it.
  2. Most of the illnesses that children are vaccinated against are not life threatening. Some have the potential to cause long-lasting, severe, health problems, but these complications are generally very rare.
  3. Long term effects of vaccines are not fully known.
  4. Now we can add adjuvants to the list…

I know that there are good arguments for vaccines, as well. The best articulated one is that vaccines have virtually wiped out some major illnesses here in the States. Polio is often given as the example.

While I am sure that vaccines have had a tremendous effect there, I don’t know if they are the only cause. Can’t overall health of the population account for some of that? Changes in diet? Improvements in medical care overall?

Ruby’s first pediatrician was rather unhappy with our decision. She was adamant that the shots were necessary and that any threats to her health were greatly exaggerated.

I imagine many doctors feel defensive in the presence of parents who make the same decision. This way of thinking challenges a great orthodoxy in modern medicine. Professionals are very protective over standard practice; that which they have ingested and internalized since they began their studies.

Western medical practice and ethics seem to mandate that we address any possible future ill effects in the present. For example, mumps potentially causing infertility in males. Parents and providers are so concerned about a one in a million chance of permanent damage from illness that they rush to treatment/prevention – consequences of that be damned!

Could it be that we are promoting worse outcomes? We have all heard speculation that Thimerosal is responsible for the increase in incidences of autism over the last twenty or so years. I know that many disagree that this is the case, e.g. the CDC, but I don’t think it’s safe to rule out completely – given the strong correlation.

In the end, it just comes down to doing the best for my daughter. I understand that there are bigger issues of public health to consider, but my greatest responsibility is for the health of my child. There is indeed a stronger risk that she will contract mumps or measles and the like. It is highly unlikely, however, that she would suffer permanent ill effects from one of those illnesses.

Exposing her to low levels of mercury and those crazy adjuvants, though, is likely to have some effect on that growing brain and body. It’s a risk we’ve elected not to take.

What to all of you think? Feel free to start a debate in the comments section.

EDIT: Childhood vaccines no longer include thimerosal in the States. Please read the comments for a continued discussion and updated information.

Share This:
  • email
  • RSS
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Netvibes
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

This Was England

July 28th, 2009

Was laid up on Saturday, as a vicious little sinus infection took hold of me gulliver. This prevented me from joining Heidi and Ruby as they ventured to a lake cabin and spent an afternoon boating and building sand castles on the beach. While this did afford me some time to feel sorry for myself and curse the ill fortune that was preventing me from sharing in the beach revelry, it also gave me enough time to catch a movie. In this case it was “This is England“, written and directed by Shane Meadows.

The film takes place in 1983 and does a wonderful job of evoking the time. It opens with a video montage showing clips of archetypical 80s events and objects: the Rubik’s Cube,  8-bit video games, the royal wedding, scenes from the Falklands War. There is a building that we see quite often throughout the movie with “Maggie’s a Twat” spraypainted on it in large, uneven letters.

That certainly was a powerful reminder of that time. What villians were in power! Both Maggie and our dear RWR had such a strong polarizing effect on people. For those of us strongly on the left, they were the people that we loved to hate. For all of their smarmy charm, both of them were butchers of men and caterers to the wealthy elite. Both had their questionable wars, Grenada and the Falklands, and both began the gutting of social programs.

It was a crazy time to be an adolescent. As all young people, we were just discovering ourselves and attempting to assert our individuality and independence. The events around us, with nuclear war always seeming to be around the corner, gave us a certain sense of powerlessness – knowing that we might be annihilated at any moment. That probably seems a bit like hyperbole, especially to those too young to remember the time, but it really isn’t. Ronald Reagan, in a famous incident, said the following during a sound check before his weekly radio address, “My fellow Americans, I’m pleased to tell you today that I’ve signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes.” [Wikipedia] Reagan thought it a good joke. Some of us, to borrow the Queen’s phrase, we were “not amused”.

"This is England" cast

"This is England" cast

It is in this milieu that punk rock really came of age. It gave those of us without a strong voice a way to channel our anger and fear into something larger. We joined a tribe and screamed loudly over the din of screeching guitars that we wouldn’t take it any longer. There was tremendous appeal in it. It is this appeal that lures the protagonist of “This is England” into his new circle of skinhead friends.

Shaun, a ten-year-old boy, befriends a motley group of skins. These are not nationalist skins, but a loose group of revival skinheads that seemed more interested in companionship and the strength of the group than in politics. Shaun finds refuge from the relentless teasing at school and the loneliness and sadness he feels after his father’s death in the Falkland War. He becomes close with the leader of the gang, Woody.

The happy little group is fractured, however, when Woody’s friend Combo gets out of prison a changed man. Combo is a fierce, crazy bastard, played by Stephen Graham (who is excellent). In the pivotal moment of the film, Combo exhorts the members of Woody’s group to join him in fighting for the “true England” and join the National Front. Some members join him, including young Shaun. It all goes to hell from there.

While the movie doesn’t entirely hang together for me, the acting is excellent from the talented ensemble cast. It may be that the group of characters was a little large, given the scope of the action, such that many characters lacked depth. Shaun and Combo are the exceptions, as the audience really gets a good sense of what motivates and contributes to the vulnerable and angry spirit in each of them.

It is certainly good watching for those of us who remember the time and knew something of the subculture. For another good film which explores powerlessness and poverty in young men, check out Scum, starring a young Ray Winstone. That is a powerful, disturbing film.

Share This:
  • email
  • RSS
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Netvibes
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

If Only I Was Half This Talented

July 27th, 2009

Damn, this guy is good! Dub FX (as seen here) creates songs by looping his beatboxing and other vocal elements live and then rapping/singing over the loops.

Share This:
  • email
  • RSS
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Netvibes
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

A Diaper Not So Dandy

July 24th, 2009
A diaper in the rearview mirror

A diaper in the rearview mirror

Those who are parents of toddlers and infants in diapers will appreciate that there are some truly shitty days. Two nights ago I made a salad that included loads of garlic, white beans, greens, artichoke hearts and herbs. This may be the last time I will feed beans to my child.

The first poop was unleashed in the bathtub, which has become a favorite place to do the deed. My wife took care of that while Ruby meandered from the tub and took a spill from her slick feet and smashed her head on the floor. Tears and ice cream followed.

The second fecal bomb was placed in her diaper, but was wet enough to leak out all over her leg and onto our living room rug. I thought the brown substance caked to her leg might be chocolate cookie from the ice cream sandwich, but found out differently when I ran my finger through the icky goo.

Beans are now verboten!

These incidents did awaken a deep sympathy for the toddlers of this world. Even the relatively privileged, like my Ruby, have countless stresses to cope with. The world is only starting to make some sense, but it is relentless in its production of stimulus. Many falls, heads battered, so many refusals, much that is arbitrary and unexplained. And, oh, the endless production of poop!

Last night I was talking with my friend Jon while his children decided it was a good idea to play with chemicals from the garage (I’m assuming pesticides and the like). After that, my travails with beans did not seem so bad, after all.

Share This:
  • email
  • RSS
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Netvibes
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

Dancing and Cancer on Television

July 22nd, 2009
Jason and Jeanine on "So You Think You Can Dance?"

Jason and Jeanine on "So You Think You Can Dance?"

My wife and I have been watching “So You Think You Can Dance?” for the past two seasons and think it’s brilliant television. There are at least a couple of things that really set it apart from the other “reality shows”.

First, it isn’t sensationalistic. The contestants don’t become the whipping boys and girls of the judges, but are treated very respectfully with a constructive approach. This isn’t to say that it isn’t sensational, however. It is definitely that!

Second, the choreography and dance styles don’t pander to popular tastes, necessarily. Many dance styles are explored, from hip hop to ballet to ballroom to contemporary. The choreography is excellent for the most part and by the latter part of the season, the dancers really live up to it.

Tonight was a very memorable show, with Melissa and Ade doing a piece about a breast cancer survivor and her supportive, loving friend. Nigel, the most stuffy and unemotive of the judges, was nearly in tears at the end and the others were visibly weeping. The performance was exceptional and the piece was beautiful and heart rending. Amazing.

It will be agonizing to see any of these last eight leave the show, although I suspect that Evan will be one of them. I have no clue which of the women will be shown the door. I will hate seeing any of the dancers go.

How about you? Any of you out there fans? What draws you to the show?

Share This:
  • email
  • RSS
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Netvibes
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter